关于司法过程的理论神话

关于司法过程的理论神话　　Abstract:Alexy’s theory of legal argumentation incapably provides the useful enlightenm

关于司法过程的理论神话 Abstract:Alexy’s theory of legal argumentation incapably provides the useful enlightenment and theinstruction for the judicial procedure and the judicial decision. With the premise lacked the empirical base and theself-contradictory logic, the theory neglected the transaction cost and the authority operation in the judicialprocess, so it has misunderstood the realistic goal totally which the judicial process pursued. When the judgescan’t obtain the satisfactory result of the judgement from the law, they should seek help from the social science,not the moral philosophy, which can’t capably provide the policy-making plan for the hard cases, but it canapproximately meet the psychological demand of the public at least to seek the rationality of the proof. 一、引言:法律论证从何而来 司法判决如何获得正当性依据?千百年来这个问题一直是西方法 哲学讨论的主题。理论家们关心的问题远不止于判决是否有法律依 据,更让他们感兴趣的是,判决的法律依据能否经得起道德哲学关于 正当性标准的检验,以及标准本身能否经得起进一步的追问,尤其是,