Professional Responsibility Outline - Sitemason职业责任sitemason轮廓

Professional Responsibility OutlineIllustration of where rules favor corporationsThemesDo our ethica

ProfessionalResponsibilityOutline Illustrationofwhererulesfavorcorporations I. Themes a. Doourethicalrulestellustodothingsourmoralitytellsusnottodo? i. Spaulding –nottellopposingclient’smedicalconditionunlessyourclientsaysitsok 1. lawyersoftenhavetoputtheirownmoralityaside. b. Wheredotheendsoftheclientendandwheredotheendsofthelawbegin?What’stheboundary? Figuringoutwhotheclientisandwhatitwantsandwhothelawisandwhatitwants.Drawingthis lineiswhatthisclassisabout.Whereisthelinebtwnusandthelawandbetweenusandourclient? c. Howoftendoesitseemtherulesandcodeconflict?Ifitdoes-why?Whobenefitsfromchangefrom thecodetotherules? d. CorporateAmericadidnotliketheCode.Itwastoofair.Itneededrulesthatwouldletitprotectits interests.Havetoaskthroughouttheclass–whythechanges?Whobenefited? I. MoralityinconflictwithLegalEthics a. Spaulding i. Facts:D’sattorneyfindsoutaPhasapotentiallyfatalmedicalcondition.Lawyersettlesthe case,butnevertellsPhehasalifethreateningcondition. ii. Moralissue:isitrightforalawyertoNOTdisclosetoapersonthisinformation?Doeslawyer haveamoraldutytotell? 1. Nomoralduty-roleoflawyeristoactinclient’sowninterest.Perhapsamoralduty ofdoctor–roleofdoctoristoactforthewell-beingofhispatient. 2. yesmoralduty–savingofalife iii. NUANCE:Pisaminor–settlementcanbeoverturned iv. RULE:(whichrule?)LawyerobligatedNOTtotellPiftheclientisNOTaminor,unlessthe clientsaiditisOKtotell.ClientConfidentiality? 1. moralPOV–shouldtell 2. legalPOV–lawyerCANNOTtellundercertaincircs b. HYPO:IfD’sinvestigatingdoctorknewofP’scondition,comestolawyerandsays,“Ineedtotellthe patient.”Whatdoeslawyerdo? i. you’renotmyclient–candowhateveryouwant.Differencebetweensayingsomethingisina client’sinterestandtellingdoctornottotell. ii. NUANCE:Clienttellslawyertotelldocnottotell.Woulditbeokforlawyertodisregardwhat clientsaid? 1. Yes.Thereisalinebtwnlawyerandclient. a. Identifyingthelinewhenalawyercanstopactingonbehalfoftheclient’s wishesisdifficult. c. Spaulding Rules/Codepotentiallyimplicatedin i. Rule3.3–falsestatement?Injuriesinsettlementdidn’tincludeaneurysm 1. Distinctionstokeeplawyeroutoftrouble a. Wasn’tafalsestatement(nothinginpaperwasfalse–itwasanommission) b. HecouldclaimhedidNOTgivethepieceofpapertothecourtthatcontained anomissionthatwasmaterial. ii. Rule3.4–FairnesstoOpposingPartyandCounselorDR7-109 1. 3.4f–requestapersonotherthanaclienttorefrainfromvoluntarilygivingrelevant informationunless(1)thepersonisasrelativeoraneeofotheragentofaclient (corporationexception);OR(2)thelawyerreasonablybelievesthattheperson’s interestswillnotbeadverselyaffectedbyrefrainingfromgivingsuchinfo a. ifhetoldthedoctornottotellanyone–maybeaviolation